A Comprehensive Hierarchical Nomenclature for Structures of the Primate Brain
The NeuroNames Hierarchy was developed to provide an indexing structure useful in computerized knowledge bases of brain structure and function. It represents a systematic, evolving attempt to codify human and macaque brain anatomy by a standard, ordered nomenclature for structures that are defined by gross morphology or cross-sectional histology. It encompasses the classical neuroanatomical nomenclature, i.e., the naming system that is based on stains which distinguish gray matter from white matter in the brain.
The hierarchical organization of the core vocabulary of NeuroNames is for the most part consistent with the Nomina Anatomica (Nomina-83) as supplemented by two texts Human Neuroanatomy (Carpenter-83, Parent-96) and The Human Nervous System (Paxinos-90). Two basic principles guiding development of the Hierarchy have been: 1) to construct an exhaustive, nested set of mutually exclusive VOLUMETRIC STRUCTURES that represents the entire brain at each level of the Hierarchy and, 2) to list all SUPERFICIAL FEATURES with the smallest volumetric structures that encompass them. In navigating the Hierarchy you will find that the volumetric substructures and superficial features are segregated so that you can tell one from the other.
In listings of the Hierarchy, TERMS IN UPPER CASE represent composite structures; TERMS IN LOWER CASE represent primary structures. Structures found reported in the HUMAN ONLY are indicated by (H); structures found reported in MACAQUE ONLY, by (M).
STRUCTURE is a very general term that refers to the brain or any subdivision thereof as identified grossly or histologically by the Nissl-stain/myelin-stain dichotomy. A structure may occupy volume or it may be a superficial feature; it may be primary or a composite of other structures; relative to other structures, it may be a substructure or superstructure within the Hierarchy. NeuroNames also includes many neuroanatomical terms that refer to structures not in the hierarchy. These we refer to as ancillary terms (see below).
A SUBSTRUCTURE is a member of an exhaustive set of mutually exclusive structures that comprise a named superstructure; it may be either a PRIMARY STRUCTURE, i.e., a structure that is not further divided in the Hierarchy, or it may itself be a lower-order superstructure within the Hierarchy. The occipital lobe, for example, is a substructure of the cerebral cortex, but it is the superstructure of the occipital gyri. A SUPERSTRUCTURE or COMPOSITE STRUCTURE is a structure composed of two or more substructures.
A SUPERFICIAL FEATURE is a part of a structure that adheres to its boundaries but that is not a member of its set of volumetric substructures. Two kinds of superficial feature are distinguished: surface features and appendages. A SURFACE FEATURE is a feature without volume; e.g., the inferior olive is a surface feature of the medulla; it is the protruding surface that defines the outer boundary of several volumetric substructures that go by different names. An APPENDAGE is a volumetric attachment to a structure, e.g., the vestibulocochlear nerve, which is an appendage of the metencephalon, but not part of the metencephalon.
An ANCILLARY STRUCTURE is a subdivision of the brain, the definition of which is based on criteria other than the gray-white dichotomy or whose boundaries are not coincident with the boundaries of any of the minimum set of structures that define the Hierarchy. Clicking the Show Relation to Hierarchy icon for an ancillary term takes one to a definition worded in terms of standard English names of structures in the Hierarchy.
Each structure in the NeuroNames Hierarchy is referenced by an ENGLISH STANDARD TERM, by a LATIN STANDARD TERM and by a unique ABBREVIATION for use in illustrations and tables.
If multiple English names are commonly used for a given structure, selection of the term to be used as its standard English name has involved weighing several principles. Briefly, they are: avoid eponyms; avoid Latin vowel combinations that are uncommon in English; avoid terms commonly used for more than one structure; strive for consistency with the names of other substructures of the same superstructure; and give preference to short names over long names. With a few exceptions necessary to produce completely parallel hierarchies in English and Latin, we have resisted the urge to create new, "more logical" names for structures.
A given structure can have any number of SYNONYMS, which are listed below the English and Latin standard terms. The first synonym is the English standard name. The second synonym is the Latin standard name. Synonyms can be in English or Latin and appear as spelled in the source.
Listing of more than one SPECIES with a given term indicates that the term has been used for morphologically homologous structures in those species. The NeuroNames Hierarchy is based on morphologic homology with the combination of substructures included in a given superstructure based on proximity. These criteria underlie the classical neuroanatomical classification of brain structures and do not necessarily imply homology based on other criteria, such as connectivity, function or ontogeny.
The ancillary terms are neuroanatomical terms (or terms which sound neuroanatomical) that refer to structures that do not coincide with structures in the Hierarchy. While they represent legitimate neuroanatomical entities, they are not necessary elements of the minimal and exhaustive set of mutually exclusive structures required to describe the primate brain. Thus, they are described separately from the Hierarchy.
Ancillary terms fall into several major categories. Almost half represent alternate ways of subdividing the brain. Many others sound as though they might be in the brain, but refer to structures outside the brain, e.g., structures in the spinal cord. Another group consists of terms that refer to fiber pathways that are not readily distinguishable in myelin-stained sections. Other ancillary terms are based on cytoarchitectural, myeloarchitectural, embryological, or functional characteristics, or are based on connectivity.
The ancillary terms have been defined as accurately as possible using the standard English names of structures in the NeuroNames Hierarchy. Click on the name of any structure in the definition to view more information about it.
We have attempted to list at least one authoritative source for each term in each species (human, nonhuman primate, or rodent). Most of the sources listed represent the first publication in which we encountered the term, not the first where it was used. Click the source name to see the reference and an abstract or description of the publication in which the synonym was identified.
For standard English terms as applied to the human brain, the most commonly cited sources are Carpenter-83, Crosby-62, Paxinos-90, and Roberts-70. For the nonhuman primate brain the primary sources are Walker-40, Bonin-47, Krieg-75, and Szabo-84. For the rodent brain, the sources of standard English terms, as cited in Bowden-97, are Paxinos-86 and Swanson-92.
The source of most of the abbreviations, which are based on the standard English terms, is Paxinos-86. The abbreviations for structures not reported in that source were generated according to the principles established there.
For standard Latin terms as applied to the human brain, the most commonly cited sources are Nomina-83, Riley-43 and Stephan-75. For the nonhuman primate brain they are Oertel-69, Olszewski-52, and Shantha-68.
NeuroNames is given as the source of a term if a name had to be generated in order to have both a standard English name and a standard Latin name in the Hierarchy and no published source for such a term was found. In most cases, such terms are English translations of commonly used Latin names. NeuroNames is also given as the source of the Latin translation of English terms for which no published Latin equivalent was found.
The several thousand terms in NeuroNames were drawn from more than 70 other publications. Those listed below include systematic nomenclatures of particular parts of the brain which we have attempted to relate as comprehensively and accurately as possible to the NeuroNames Hierarchy. Many terms from these sources are identical to the standard English or Latin terms for structures in the Hierarchy. Others are synonyms of the standard names. Still others represent alternate ways of subdividing the brain and are described in terms of the standard English names of structures in the Hierarchy.
The NeuroNames nomenclature includes a total of about 6500 terms (See table below). It allows a complete description of the primate brain in terms of about 860 structures (approximately 550 primary volumetric structures, 120 superstructures and 190 superficial structures). Using NeuroNames, any point in the brain can be located unambiguously to a single primary structure. Thus, mastery of the names (in English or Latin), definitions and relationships among about 860 structures should provide one with a working knowledge of the basic neuroanatomy of the primate brain. Since each of the structures in the Hierarchy has a standard English name and a standard Latin name, that portion of the nomenclature accounts for 1726 of the total terms.
The remaining terms represent ancillary structures or are synonyms. With 872 ancillary structures, synonyms account for almost two-thirds of the total neuroanatomical vocabulary (almost 4000 terms).
Structures (total 1735)
Terms (total 6549)
|
1991 | Version 1 of NeuroNames programmed in HyperCard, copyrighted and issued on diskette for the Macintosh. |
1993 | Version 1 of NeuroNames English Hierarchy incorporated as source vocabulary into the Metathesaurus of the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) of National Library of Medicine (Source Vocabulary UWA92) |
1995 | NeuroNames Hierarchy peer reviewed and modified for publication (Bowden, 1995). Superstructures pruned to eliminate disputed categories; primary structures added and subtracted to conform to 12 recent texts and atlases. |
1996 | Version 2 of NeuroNames English Hierarchy incorporated into the Metathesaurus of UMLS (Source Vocabulary NEU95). |
1996 | Template Atlas of the Primate Brain with structures labeled according to NeuroNames peer-reviewed and published in condensed journal format (Martin, 1996). |
1997 | Template Atlas website established with downloadable templates for plotting neuroanatomical data. |
1997 | Complete Template Atlas published by Primate Information Center (Martin, 1997). |
1998 | Version 3 of NeuroNames Hierarchy revised. Major changes were to clarify structures found only in the human or only in the nonhuman primate brain, to include subdivisions of some structures that were previously primary structures, and to simplify some of the more cumbersome standard terms, e.g., "amygdala" for "amygdaloid nuclear complex." |
1998 | Version 3 of NeuroNames English Hierarchy submitted for incorporation into 1999 Metathesaurus of UMLS (NEU98). |
1998 | Semantic network of NeuroNames extended to define several hundred brain structures in terms of the standard terminology of the Hierarchy and to provide synonyms for structures in the rat brain regarded as morphologically homologous to structures in the Hierarchy (Bowden, 1997). |
1998 | NeuroNames website established with direct interface to the Template Atlas of Primate Brain to show structures in the macaque brain and with Web interface to the Digital Anatomist to show Hierarchy structures in the human brain. |
2000 | NeuroNames synonyms for Hierarchy terms incorporated into the UMLS. |
2000 | NeuroNames and Template Atlas, including templates for downloading, incorporated into Primate Brain Maps: Structure of the Macaque Brain, a book and compact disk combination issued by Elsevier Science. |